Last week I had a conversation with a friend of mine.
She said:
"God is like a school teacher on playground duty. He doesn't let things get completely out of control, but He watches the bad stuff that we do to one another, but isn't really in control of it all."I can understand that this statement comes from her looking at bad stuff that happens and what role God plays in all of that.
Is God like a school teacher on playground duty? Is God really in control? What does it mean if we are to say that God isn't in control?
Open Theism is a danger for the church. It undermines our very confidence in God. My friend feels the tension that lay between God's goodness which she knows, but also that evil happens. Open Theism is attractive to people who struggle with working out why evil happens.
A
reformed approach says that God knows in advance everything that will happen, every exact and precise detail. God knows the suffering and evil that will occur. This does not in any way mean that God is responsible for sin. God uses suffering for his good purposes (
Rom 5:1-5).
Open Theists argue that if God cannot know about the evil and suffering that will occur. They want to absolve God from any moral responsibility of creating or being involved in sin and suffering. They say that their God is one who wishes that suffering and pain does not occur, and when we foolish humans do things that cause suffering, then God is there to provide us with the strength and endurance to get through it.
This is why it is persuasive. And dangerous.
So why do bad things happen to good people? Can God really be in control? If God knows exactly what bad stuff is going to happen to us, then surely he must bare the responsibility for setting it in place, and as such cannot be a loving God? Surely it is not for our good?
The following is a list of what open theists say about pain and suffering:
- God does not know in advance the future free actions of his moral creatures
- God cannot control the future free actions of his moral creatures
- Tragic events occur over which God has no control
- When tragedies occur, God should not be blamed, becuase he was not able to prevent them from occuring, and he certainly did not will or cause them to occur
- Suffering is gratuitous and pointless, ie suffering has no positive or redeeming quality to it all, so that God should never be seen as intending suffering in order to bring some good from it
Bruce Ware, Their God is too small: Open Theism and the Undermining of Confidence in God (Crossway: Illinois, 2003) 67-8
You see, I can understand and feel weight of this arguement. But as I said to my friend, once you start saying that God is not in control, there are some pretty serious implications.
If God is not in control, then who is? satan? no one or nothing?
Is God omniscient or omnipotent?
I believe this arguement for God stems from a misunderstanding of God's goodness.
BY NO MEANS is suffering good in and of itself. The very fabric of this creation is torn and groaning for a release from its suffering (
Rom 8:18-24). Suffering is not something that is part of the way that God created things, that is why there is the hope of future re-creation, the hope of glory.
Open theists will say that suffering is not designed by God and has no good. But I disagree. I believe that God uses suffering for good. I believe that he ordains suffering to serve a purpose. A good purpose.
And since when has God promised that life as a Christian would not have suffering?
So is God like a school teacher on playground duty? Is your God in control of the good, the bad, the small and the large? If he isn't, who is in control of those things?
--
a few initial thoughts, I'm sure there will be more to come later, but i didn't want too long a post.Now what do you think?